Re: solution
Nov. 13th, 2007 04:01 pmOkay, here it is, then. How can Chaz conceivably lie still and listen to someone saying "three or less", and not scream in outrage?
The answer is that I think - I think (but am very open to correction on this) - that he was right to say so.
Okay, this is how it was. I was lying still and listening to the radio: ergo, I was in bed. Ergo, it was late night or early morning. What happens on Radio 4, late night and early morning? Yes, O my beloved 'earers: the shipping forecast.
This was a measurement of wind, on the Beaufort scale. He said - as it might be - "German Bight, northeast veering easterly, three or less," and I assert that he was right to do so. You couldn't possibly say "three or fewer," when you're talking about the strength of the wind. Could you...?
The answer is that I think - I think (but am very open to correction on this) - that he was right to say so.
Okay, this is how it was. I was lying still and listening to the radio: ergo, I was in bed. Ergo, it was late night or early morning. What happens on Radio 4, late night and early morning? Yes, O my beloved 'earers: the shipping forecast.
This was a measurement of wind, on the Beaufort scale. He said - as it might be - "German Bight, northeast veering easterly, three or less," and I assert that he was right to do so. You couldn't possibly say "three or fewer," when you're talking about the strength of the wind. Could you...?