...and for those of you not keeping up,
we have a Song for Harry!
papersky wrote the words,
carandol wrote the tune and recorded it. I am astonished, and moved beyond words...
- but it is not totally impossible that we have a picture.
I said before that there were a couple of photographs in the bible. This was inaccurate, twice over. Before this whole story reaches any further, let me correct my own idiocy: it's not actually a bible. I knew this, I had just forgotten it. It looks like an old Victorian family bible, and it is unutterably filthy; these two together caused me to be heedless this time around. Actually, it's a Victorian illustrated edition of
The Pilgrim's Progress.
Be that as it may, clearly it served the same purpose, a repository of memories and loss; and I have now found four photographs between its pages. I had originally meant to give one away, which is why I was being discreet about 'em, but actually I think they should all stay together, so here's the list.
One is a portrait turned into a postcard, as they used to do: an Edwardian woman in her best hat (which is a fabulous confection). I'm guessing as to period, of course, but anyone who knows about costume should find it reasonably easy to place.
The others I guess (there's a lot of guessing here: visuals are not my thing) to be contact prints from glass plates; they are fuzzy and faded, and the one with the car registration plate is clearly reversed.
That one shows a Very Old Car, with a man completely indistinguishable behind the wheel and the windscreen, a woman in the passenger seat and a little girl standing beside, leaning against the door. Another man in the distance, by a wall. An expert would identify the car easily (registration number BB 1632); the people I suspect must be forever mysterious.
The second print (mounted on white paper and black card) shows five men with three motorcycles and perhaps a sidecar. They're got up with waterproofs and caps (with goggles!), but they might just be identifiable, against other known images.
And the last print? Is a round one, clearly meant for a frame; and it's a young man in jacket and tie. At first glance, I'd have said he's older than twenty, but I'm not at all sure. Visuals not my thing, and particularly judging people's ages; and I tend to overestimate young people from long ago particularly, because all the cues are wrong (jacket! tie!). And of course I want this to be Harry, though I really don't suppose it is.
I stress again, these are all old and faded and blurred; it may be impossible to reproduce them in any format worth the posting. But I might try.