Radiation

Jul. 6th, 2006 06:46 pm
desperance: (Default)
[personal profile] desperance
Umm - thinks - is it possible to radiate in one direction only, or only in a few? Or is 'radiate in all directions' an absolute tautology, in all circumstances? Answer on one side of the interweb only...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-06 05:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adrian-turtle.livejournal.com
Radiation is usually isotropic, but a radiation source can be partly shielded so it only radiates on one side. (Think of a charcoal grill. Light and heat radiate up and sideways, but the base of the grill mostly prevents it from going down.) An individual piece of charcoal may be radiating in all directions, but a person looking at the whole grill from across the yard would not perceive it on that scale.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-06 09:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] desperance.livejournal.com
Clear as unshielded glass, thank you - and a new word, too (isotropic - I have almost no scientific vocabulary at all. And yet I aspire to write SF. That's 'aspire' in the standing-at-the-bottom-of-the-mountain, gazing-up-in-awe-and-wonder sort of sense...).

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-07 01:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adrian-turtle.livejournal.com
"Isotropic" is a great word, if you're just starting to build your scientific vocabulary. It means something is the same in all directions. If there is more in one direction than others, it is "anisotropic." If you're looking from a distance, the way we look at stars, radiation is isotropic. But if we were close enough, there might be enough anisotropy to matter, like with the grill example.

Profile

desperance: (Default)
desperance

November 2017

S M T W T F S
   1 234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags