Feb. 22nd, 2009
Conan! What is best in dinner parties?
Feb. 22nd, 2009 02:33 pmBest in dinner parties is to have leftovers, and a relatively tidy house; but the greatest of these is leftovers.
Soup and apple cake for lunch: and you have no idea how glad I am to be able to type those words. Not just for the eating thereof, but apple cake and I have had a fraught relationship for a quarter of a century, tho' we'd ever only met the once.
In brief, I made one - at least, I followed a recipe for one - 'way back in the eighties, for a dinner party again, and it was a catastrophe. The batter split and would not cake, the apples didn't cook... Urgh. And yet the whole apple-cake idea still seemed lovely to me, in that way that unconsummated relationships so often do; so I have held it in my head as a treasured ideal ever since, but never quite dared to ask it out on a date again. As it were.
Until Friday night, when I just decided to be bold. I had found a recipe that - after being absurdly, impossibly particular about the proper type of rare Dorset apple to be used - more or less said "mix up your ingredients and bake your cake" when it came to the actual instructions bit. So I giggled cheerfully and poked around in the internets, and came up with a more-or-less consensus view on the Dorset apple cake (cream butter and sugar, add eggs and flour and lemon zest, a couple of tsps of baking powder to give it a little lift, mix in chopped apple, pour into tin and sprinkle with demerara, and bake same).
So I did that, more or less, and it was very nice. I am no longer scared of apple cake, and will do it again. Perhaps with a little ground almond next time, substituting for some of the flour.
It is absurd, though, how long these anxieties persist. I have a similar omigod-I-can't-do-that about stuffed aubergines, because I tried one recipe once thirty years ago and it was horrid. Really, the problem is that I have too much choice and I don't cook enough, so I need never repeat a failure. Concomitantly and contrariwise, neither do I often get to try interesting variations. I'd like to bake a dozen apple cakes, just to figure out which one is best; but I don't suppose I'll do a dozen in my lifetime, just because there is always so much else.
Also, I would like to revisit Harold McGee to determine the difference between baking powder and bicarbonate of soda, and test same with examples, just so that I have actual knowledge rather than needing recipes. But I don't suppose I ever actually shall.
Soup and apple cake for lunch: and you have no idea how glad I am to be able to type those words. Not just for the eating thereof, but apple cake and I have had a fraught relationship for a quarter of a century, tho' we'd ever only met the once.
In brief, I made one - at least, I followed a recipe for one - 'way back in the eighties, for a dinner party again, and it was a catastrophe. The batter split and would not cake, the apples didn't cook... Urgh. And yet the whole apple-cake idea still seemed lovely to me, in that way that unconsummated relationships so often do; so I have held it in my head as a treasured ideal ever since, but never quite dared to ask it out on a date again. As it were.
Until Friday night, when I just decided to be bold. I had found a recipe that - after being absurdly, impossibly particular about the proper type of rare Dorset apple to be used - more or less said "mix up your ingredients and bake your cake" when it came to the actual instructions bit. So I giggled cheerfully and poked around in the internets, and came up with a more-or-less consensus view on the Dorset apple cake (cream butter and sugar, add eggs and flour and lemon zest, a couple of tsps of baking powder to give it a little lift, mix in chopped apple, pour into tin and sprinkle with demerara, and bake same).
So I did that, more or less, and it was very nice. I am no longer scared of apple cake, and will do it again. Perhaps with a little ground almond next time, substituting for some of the flour.
It is absurd, though, how long these anxieties persist. I have a similar omigod-I-can't-do-that about stuffed aubergines, because I tried one recipe once thirty years ago and it was horrid. Really, the problem is that I have too much choice and I don't cook enough, so I need never repeat a failure. Concomitantly and contrariwise, neither do I often get to try interesting variations. I'd like to bake a dozen apple cakes, just to figure out which one is best; but I don't suppose I'll do a dozen in my lifetime, just because there is always so much else.
Also, I would like to revisit Harold McGee to determine the difference between baking powder and bicarbonate of soda, and test same with examples, just so that I have actual knowledge rather than needing recipes. But I don't suppose I ever actually shall.
I am sitting here making my way through the scribbles on the typescript, making changes; and I have come to that page where "reluctant" and "reluctance" occur four times in a dozen - no, wait [*counts*] - in eight lines. And fond as I am of repetition for effect, that might be overegging the pudding just a little (an offence, I may say, of which I have never been guilty).
I had, apparently, made a little note to myself, presumably to this effect; the fourth occurrence was underlined to draw my attention to it, and there was a squiggle in the margin.
Which I sat for minutes trying to read, eliminating possibilities - sugar? sign? - until there was nothing left, and none of them had meant anything like reluctance. And the really irritating thing was that I remembered writing it, remembered thinking "am I going to be able to read that?" and deciding that of course I could, or at least that the scribble would be sufficient reminder of my thought.
Hah. I have been driven - which I almost never am - to my Roget, to look up synonyms for reluctance; which was no help at all, despite offering lots, including at least one word I didn't know (anyone for renitency?). And I still couldn't think of anything better, or even likely; so I went back to the scribble yet one more time, with Roget still on my mind - and, oh. Yes. I remember. I have written "syn". For "synonym". A prompt to think of one, because I couldn't do it just then.
As it happens, I still can't do it. But at least now I know what it is I cannot do...
I had, apparently, made a little note to myself, presumably to this effect; the fourth occurrence was underlined to draw my attention to it, and there was a squiggle in the margin.
Which I sat for minutes trying to read, eliminating possibilities - sugar? sign? - until there was nothing left, and none of them had meant anything like reluctance. And the really irritating thing was that I remembered writing it, remembered thinking "am I going to be able to read that?" and deciding that of course I could, or at least that the scribble would be sufficient reminder of my thought.
Hah. I have been driven - which I almost never am - to my Roget, to look up synonyms for reluctance; which was no help at all, despite offering lots, including at least one word I didn't know (anyone for renitency?). And I still couldn't think of anything better, or even likely; so I went back to the scribble yet one more time, with Roget still on my mind - and, oh. Yes. I remember. I have written "syn". For "synonym". A prompt to think of one, because I couldn't do it just then.
As it happens, I still can't do it. But at least now I know what it is I cannot do...
Leftovers, cont...
Feb. 22nd, 2009 09:11 pmA layer of the beef-and-sherry stew in the bottom of a pyrex dish; topped with the last of the buttered-cabbage-with-juniper; topped with the last of the smooth olive-oil mash; put in a hot oven till brown & crispy on top.
What is this?
Yup. This is exceedingly posh cottage pie. And absolutely yummy.
*eats*
What is this?
Yup. This is exceedingly posh cottage pie. And absolutely yummy.
*eats*