Telephone etiquette
Feb. 12th, 2008 04:54 pmI am famously antagonistic towards telephones. We never had one till I was a teenager, and I've never been comfortable with them; I don't have a mobile, and rarely use the landline. I may be over-reacting, therefore, or misinterpreting a commonplace. But. I hate it, hate hate hate, when the phone rings and I answer it with my usual "Yes, hullo?" and the voice at the other end says "Who's that speaking, please?" or near equivalent. It seems to me extraordinarily rude: they called me, which means they should know who I am; they're the stranger in this relationship. Also, this is my home which they have chosen to invade, so ditto ditto. Either way, it's theirs to declare their own identity, rather than demanding mine. And I usually say so, quite sharpish.
It's almost always a wrong number, of course, which doesn't improve my temper. Of course it is; people who are intentionally phoning me tend to know who's going to be answering my phone, ie me. I don't mind them checking, "Hullo, is that Chaz?" or near equivalent; it's the blank stranger-to-stranger demands that really rile me. It's an extension of the inherent intrusion of making a phone-call in the first place, the assumption that it's okay to interrupt me unannounced; to heap Ossa upon Pelion by backing that with the assumption that it's okay to interrogate me before ever they identify themselves just enrages me.
Or am I being precious and mimsy...?
It's almost always a wrong number, of course, which doesn't improve my temper. Of course it is; people who are intentionally phoning me tend to know who's going to be answering my phone, ie me. I don't mind them checking, "Hullo, is that Chaz?" or near equivalent; it's the blank stranger-to-stranger demands that really rile me. It's an extension of the inherent intrusion of making a phone-call in the first place, the assumption that it's okay to interrupt me unannounced; to heap Ossa upon Pelion by backing that with the assumption that it's okay to interrogate me before ever they identify themselves just enrages me.
Or am I being precious and mimsy...?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 05:33 pm (UTC)I had one of those last week when somebody called and asked "Is that Eneit Press?" and I was in a bad mood and said "No, I'll just get it" and hung up.
But I am an arse...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 05:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 05:34 pm (UTC)Telephones are very useful, but I am a firm believer in letting the answering machine take a message.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 05:34 pm (UTC)> the voice at the other end says "Who's that speaking, please?"
I used to get this a lot when I lived in Cyprus. It really *REALLY* wound me up. I would deliberately not answer the question and sometimes people hung up - even when they had the right number. My conclusion is that it is a cultural thing. There is no right and wrong here - what you and I see as rude - they dont!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 05:48 pm (UTC)And - again with drawing the line of division, us and them - I wonder why it would be Cypriot, particularly...?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 07:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 05:46 pm (UTC)As I get older and more impatient, I grow to prefer email more and more because it's asynchronous--I can answer when and how I choose. The insistent "drop everything and answer me RIGHT NOW" demand of a ringing phone is inherently intrusive.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 05:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 06:12 pm (UTC)At work, if someone has come to talk through something with me, I put my phone on voicemail so as not to be interrupted, and if we're at their desk, I ask them to do the same.
At home, I tend to answer the phone with "Hello" and then if they don't identify themselves ask "Who's calling?" (which I think makes it quite clear that the onus is on the caller to identify themselves first).
There was a fluffy book I read once where the heroine was very annoyed with her father-in-law who persistently asked who was speaking when he rang her. It's the only thing from that book that has stuck in my mind.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 06:19 pm (UTC)Just because it rings, you don't have to answer it, and when it's one of Those Times, people generally know it already and can make allowances.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 06:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 06:24 pm (UTC)Online communication also gets around that whole 'living in different timezones' problem, which I like (I get to hear about what you're making for dinner while I'm having lunch!)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 11:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 05:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 05:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 05:54 pm (UTC)And I hate phones, too...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 05:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 06:11 pm (UTC)There's a reason I use the answering machine to screen calls, and it's because my time, once I'm home, is worth it. Especially in this age of the robo-caller, and an election year.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 06:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 06:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 07:20 pm (UTC)She hasn't quite given up yet...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 06:30 pm (UTC)Two hours later....
This kept happening and happening, because the hapless Mike had apparently given out my cell phone number as his cell phone number, far and wide. The capper was when the phone rang at 3 and I didn't get to it in time. I heard the little "there's a message" noise. Then it rang again, and I picked it up and grated, "MIKE IS NOT HERE BECAUSE THIS IS NOT HIS PHONE." A chagrined voice on the other end said, "Oh. Um. Sorry. Is this [my number]?" I said, "Yes, and it's my phone, not this idiot Mike's." "I'm very sorry," said the pathetic voice.
In the morning I listened to the voicemail. Same pathetic voice: "Um...Mike? Weren't you going to pick me up at the bus station when I got to town? Because I've been waiting here in White Bear for an hour and a half now, and it's getting kind of cold...." Poor schmuck. I hope he makes better friends than Mike someday.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 08:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 06:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 06:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 07:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 07:10 pm (UTC)Since then I have come up with what I consider to be a brilliant plan, should this situation occur again, in which 'for security' I ask the caller to tell me their father's name, their favourite colour and the capital of Canada. Once they have answered the questions I shall tell them that not all the answers were correct and that 'for security reasons' I must terminate the conversation immediately. I almost hope I do get another of those calls.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 07:15 pm (UTC)It is common courtesy for the person who places the call to announce themselves to the person they call. If they can't even do that, but launch immediately into rude interrogations, it is obvious they will be unpleasant to deal with. I lack interest in mollifying such people.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 07:18 pm (UTC)And we've had an elderly woman call us periodically for *years.* She goes in cycles, apparently. She'll call every night for two weeks asking for "Ethel" or "Martha" and when we gently explain she has the wrong number, she will tell us we're mistaken. We're mistaken? Um, ookaaaaay....Then she'll get tired of us and we won't hear from her for a month or so. And then, out of the blue, she'll start calling again. Drives me batty.
I've learned not to answer the phone if I can avoid it. Thank goodness for the internet. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 07:27 pm (UTC)I don't like answering the phone, so I assume that other people don't, either, and so I hate to make them.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 07:49 pm (UTC)You have no idea how much better I feel at work not being at anyone's beck and call on a bloody telephone.
Could you put that in the post please . . . funny, they just hung up.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 08:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 09:55 pm (UTC)"Could I speak to Slim Palmer please?"
My reply is usually: 'What's it in connection with as we are members of the "Telephone Preference Service"?'
*brrrrr....*
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 11:24 pm (UTC)Of course once you've actually got me on the phone I chatter away like nothing on earth...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 11:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 12:07 am (UTC)*mimsies*
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 11:44 pm (UTC)In a previous job, I got so pissed off with the man whom I was talking to, in his room, always answering the phone and speaking to his callers and making me wait, that I went next door and called him up.
We have a rule (I made it up last week, but should have done so years before) that we do not respond to cold callers. It makes good sense, not only can you be off the phone in 30 seconds but you make better decisions if you have the chance to consider it in your own time.
DOes anyone else get recorded messages about a government scheme to help you clear all your debts, just press 5?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-13 05:07 pm (UTC)"Did you want to talk to Other Person?" I'll ask.
Mobile phones are excellent for their SMS capabilities.
One can choose whether to pay attention or not, and answer at ones leisure. Also, not having everyone around hear ones private conversation
Also neat is the ability to switch the thing to 'silent' mode. Then check messages at your leisure, or not at all.
(I also like having a mobile phone because I tend to have an abysmal sense of time, and be late to meeting people. I can call and say "I am late" and not leave them waiting without a clue. )
The other thing I use my mobile for: I have reciepts for SMS turned on. I get the reciept when the other phone gets the message. This way I can tell when they have emerged from the underground.
How are you today?
Date: 2008-02-14 11:07 am (UTC)Perhaps I should work out a five-minute monologue.