Telephone etiquette
Feb. 12th, 2008 04:54 pmI am famously antagonistic towards telephones. We never had one till I was a teenager, and I've never been comfortable with them; I don't have a mobile, and rarely use the landline. I may be over-reacting, therefore, or misinterpreting a commonplace. But. I hate it, hate hate hate, when the phone rings and I answer it with my usual "Yes, hullo?" and the voice at the other end says "Who's that speaking, please?" or near equivalent. It seems to me extraordinarily rude: they called me, which means they should know who I am; they're the stranger in this relationship. Also, this is my home which they have chosen to invade, so ditto ditto. Either way, it's theirs to declare their own identity, rather than demanding mine. And I usually say so, quite sharpish.
It's almost always a wrong number, of course, which doesn't improve my temper. Of course it is; people who are intentionally phoning me tend to know who's going to be answering my phone, ie me. I don't mind them checking, "Hullo, is that Chaz?" or near equivalent; it's the blank stranger-to-stranger demands that really rile me. It's an extension of the inherent intrusion of making a phone-call in the first place, the assumption that it's okay to interrupt me unannounced; to heap Ossa upon Pelion by backing that with the assumption that it's okay to interrogate me before ever they identify themselves just enrages me.
Or am I being precious and mimsy...?
It's almost always a wrong number, of course, which doesn't improve my temper. Of course it is; people who are intentionally phoning me tend to know who's going to be answering my phone, ie me. I don't mind them checking, "Hullo, is that Chaz?" or near equivalent; it's the blank stranger-to-stranger demands that really rile me. It's an extension of the inherent intrusion of making a phone-call in the first place, the assumption that it's okay to interrupt me unannounced; to heap Ossa upon Pelion by backing that with the assumption that it's okay to interrogate me before ever they identify themselves just enrages me.
Or am I being precious and mimsy...?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 05:46 pm (UTC)As I get older and more impatient, I grow to prefer email more and more because it's asynchronous--I can answer when and how I choose. The insistent "drop everything and answer me RIGHT NOW" demand of a ringing phone is inherently intrusive.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 05:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 06:12 pm (UTC)At work, if someone has come to talk through something with me, I put my phone on voicemail so as not to be interrupted, and if we're at their desk, I ask them to do the same.
At home, I tend to answer the phone with "Hello" and then if they don't identify themselves ask "Who's calling?" (which I think makes it quite clear that the onus is on the caller to identify themselves first).
There was a fluffy book I read once where the heroine was very annoyed with her father-in-law who persistently asked who was speaking when he rang her. It's the only thing from that book that has stuck in my mind.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 06:19 pm (UTC)Just because it rings, you don't have to answer it, and when it's one of Those Times, people generally know it already and can make allowances.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 06:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 06:24 pm (UTC)Online communication also gets around that whole 'living in different timezones' problem, which I like (I get to hear about what you're making for dinner while I'm having lunch!)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-12 11:26 pm (UTC)