desperance: (Default)
[personal profile] desperance
I just completely misread a press release, "The BBC has signed a disagreement with..."

Oh, if only. I want, nay, I demand that disagreements shall become contractual: "I disagree with what you say, and we shall both sign a statement to that effect, outlining the Heads of Disagreement and all that they imply..."

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-13 01:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeremy-m.livejournal.com
Last night my psychology lecturer, who is prone to malapropisms at the best of times, mentioned the Donner Party and the more recent Andes 'plane crash where survivors - desperate to survive with no food - had to resort to capitalism.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-13 01:39 pm (UTC)
owlfish: (Default)
From: [personal profile] owlfish
Capitalism: Where the proletariat rise up and EAT the bourgeosie. (Or am I now getting capitalism confused with zombies?)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-13 01:48 pm (UTC)
lagilman: coffee or die (Default)
From: [personal profile] lagilman
are atrophied brains as yummy as non-atrophied ones? Are there brains a self-respecting proletariat zombie won't touch? Man, how humiliating that would be, to have your brain rejected as a zombie-treat!

*grabs idea, holds onto it fiercely*

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-13 01:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] desperance.livejournal.com
Weirdly [you're all weird! *sobs*] I dreamed of brains last night. Specifically, of buying sheep's brains in the local Asian foodstore. Which sells many wonderful things, including many parts of sheep, but not alas the brains...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-13 02:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mizkit.livejournal.com
*laughs*!!!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-13 01:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fidelioscabinet.livejournal.com
I am trying to imagine a society wehre they did that sort of thing...I wonder what the penalty for violating a formal Disagreement would be?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-13 01:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] desperance.livejournal.com
'Zackly. Clear breach of contract, if you suddenly see someone else's point of view. Disagreements rendered null and void, actions for Breach of Feud... Chaos!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-13 01:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/la_marquise_de_/
No, no, this is the Dept of Contradiction...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-13 01:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] farwing.livejournal.com
*gigglesnort* I love this idea.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-13 01:48 pm (UTC)
lagilman: coffee or die (Default)
From: [personal profile] lagilman
That. Is. Perfect.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-13 02:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mizkit.livejournal.com
Ted wants to know how your thumb is doing!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-13 03:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] desperance.livejournal.com
The thumb is really quite well, thank him kindly. You have to look with care to see a scar (that's plastic surgeons for you, I guess; even when their prime engagement is with the processes beneath, they still have an eye to the superficies), and I can use it just fine; it hasn't conspicuously ached for weeks. I still can't bend it across my palm as far as the other one will go - but for what obscure purpose does one actually need to bend a thumb across a palm...?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-13 03:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mizkit.livejournal.com
Oh good!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-13 02:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sboydtaylor.livejournal.com
I disagree with you, and I will not sign on the dotted line!! ;) j/k

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-13 03:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] desperance.livejournal.com
Come, come. We must formalise this disagreement, or how can we ever depend on it?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-13 03:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sboydtaylor.livejournal.com
Well why should I give you the comfort of knowing you have a dependable disagreement for free? What it's in it for me?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-13 05:15 pm (UTC)
lagilman: coffee or die (Default)
From: [personal profile] lagilman
a right to full examination of any and all arguments and proofs he may bring out to support his disagreement, including those he pulls out of his arse (although you might want to have a sub-clause specifying that a duly-appointed representative will inspect those)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-13 05:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sboydtaylor.livejournal.com
Hmm. Tempting. Are there any actionable provisions if one party does not fully disclose their arguments, sources, and arses?

Profile

desperance: (Default)
desperance

November 2017

S M T W T F S
   1 234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags