desperance: (Default)
[personal profile] desperance
Because I know you enjoy these things. These glimpses of doubt and moments of legitimate enquiry.

Consider grace: that quality, that attribute. I'm trying not to be fancy or theological here; divine grace is a wholly different issue (I hope). But can I reasonably call grace a virtue?

Oh, all right. Context:

If there was only one thing Grace did well, with a natural confidence and the virtue she was named for, swimming would be that thing. Water became her.

I wrote that, and then hesitated, and did a dictionary-scramble, and cycled through - well, "quality" and "attribute", largely - and came back to virtue, as I do, because that's what I want. But if readers are going to stumble and cry "grace is not a virtue! it's a quality/attribute/gift!" then I should probably avoid it. (Note for the curious: yes, this is absolutely how I read a text, I argue with it all the time. I stopped reading one author altogether because he perpetrated one clumsy double-meaning that I was sure he did not intend.)

sorry, no

Date: 2011-08-18 06:02 pm (UTC)
movingfinger: (Default)
From: [personal profile] movingfinger
Physical grace is an attribute, not a virtue; social grace is a personal quality, and though it may make the gracious person appear more virtuous, it is not a virtue either. Spiritual grace is not a virtue either.

I would notice the "wrongness" there right away and lodge a mental objection. Distracting.

ETA: the problem is that virtue is an outcome of morality and swimming/physicality is amoral.
Edited (esprit d'escalier) Date: 2011-08-18 06:04 pm (UTC)

Profile

desperance: (Default)
desperance

November 2017

S M T W T F S
   1 234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags