desperance: (Default)
[personal profile] desperance
Damn. This is further to my last:

[livejournal.com profile] arkessian checked the 1901 census, and found a Henry E Hoad born in Westgate in 1897: exactly the right age, exactly the right location. Hurrah!

Prompted by [livejournal.com profile] papersky, I checked records of soldiers killed in the First World War.

And found a record of one Henry Ellis Hoad, of Newcastle on Tyne. The site wouldn't tell me anything more without I paid up money, which I am reluctant to do; but even so...

Sigh.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-15 04:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] athenais.livejournal.com
I am appalled that a battle where they lost 16,000 men was considered a success just because the opposition lost 25,000. Poor Harry Hoad.

ETA: Well, not "just." It was successfully planned and executed. But the scale of those casualties is almost unimaginable to me.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-15 06:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeremy-m.livejournal.com
Success in the war of attrition sense: you win by bearing the unbearable for longer than the other side can.

The particular horribleness of that war still shows up in games, since wargamers will tackle most of the grimmer bits of history but there's almost nothing on the First World War. It's just too awful even compared to other wars.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-15 07:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] desperance.livejournal.com
I didn't know that. I am, I think, surprised. And encouraged.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-15 08:09 pm (UTC)
timill: (Default)
From: [personal profile] timill
I'd have said it was a success because they took all their objectives and held them.

Profile

desperance: (Default)
desperance

November 2017

S M T W T F S
   1 234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags