desperance: (Default)
[personal profile] desperance
...some things are with us always.

Being in vaguely reorganisatory mode, I have been wandering around my office feeling overwhelmed by the sheer quantity of paper (thirty years of a writerly career, all of it documented, none of it sorted. Pity me...). And remembering, obviously, with mild degrees of snark, all those promises of the paperless office, and the way my use of paper has quadrupled since good honest typing was replaced by data-entry and the simplicity of printing yet another draft. (I understand that at least one of the bright young boys - Scalzi? Doctorow? - doesn't actually own a printer, but that's too bleeding-edge for me: I still like my words on paper. Despite the accumulated overwhelmingness of it all.)

But anyway: although this will clearly never be a paperless office, the one thing that is yet more certain is that it will never, ever be a paperclipless office. I've just been signing some contracts and posting them to my agent; as they came as PDFs and had to be printed off, they had to be paperclipped, which meant I had to grovel around behind the desk for the box of clips, where the boys had knocked it. And I hefted its familiar weight, and remembered suddenly why it is quite so familiar. I bought this box of a thousand paperclips back when I lived on a farm outside Carlisle, when I lived off writing stories for magazines and was probably posting half a dozen a week, using many paperclips. Even then, though, almost as many came in as went out, one way or another; and these days I rarely use a paperclip at all. The farm outside Carlisle was twenty-five years ago, and the box is still half full. I do not expect to see its bottom in my lifetime. I think I should bequeath it to someone, as an heirloom of my house.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-01-19 10:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mizkit.livejournal.com
That was a good story. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-01-19 10:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shewhomust.livejournal.com
They breed, you know.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-01-19 10:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] durham-rambler.livejournal.com
Along with that promise of a paperless office was the statement One day there will be one computer per desk. That's a station I seem to have passed through on a non-stopping train.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-01-19 02:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] martyn44.livejournal.com
One computer per desk? Just one?

Of course we've all got more computing power in our mobile phones than there was in a mainframe when I saw my first terminal in an office (I believe that mainframe has been passed on to my current employers, but that's another story)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-01-19 04:25 pm (UTC)
ellarien: Blue/purple pansy (Default)
From: [personal profile] ellarien
I couldn't resist using this icon here! It doesn't represent my usual setup, but I've had two computers on my desk at work (Solaris or Linux box for the heavy lifting and Windoze laptop for Office apps and portability) most of the time since the turn of the millennium.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-01-19 11:12 am (UTC)
ext_58972: Mad! (Default)
From: [identity profile] autopope.livejournal.com
I own a printer. However, it is still on its first toner cartridge and it is out of warranty.

In contrast, I scan roughly 2000 pages per year. Every time I work over a CEM or galley, I scan the sucker before I mail it back. This is equivalent to photocopying it without wasting the trees; if it gets lost in the post, then I hit the "print" button for another copy. (NB: this has saved my ass at least once in the past two years, when the Royal Mail lost a CEM.)

One day I shall buy myself a nice (and expensive) Fujitsu document scanner and get rid of all the paper. If you're willing to pay 300 quid and up, here's a type of scanner that can scan double-sided documents at 30 pages per minute, blast the output into PDF format, OCR and index the text so it's searchable, and dump it into a folder on a Mac or PC (no Linux drivers, dammit).

(There is not, as yet, an option to pipe the output slot straight to the shredder, but you can see where it might complete the idea.)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-01-19 12:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] desperance.livejournal.com
The printer thing is what reminds me that I am officially of a previous generation, professionally speaking; when I was new and bleeding-edge - I was the first person to supply Hodder's typesetters with a text on disk - I was very aware of being one step ahead of those who clung to their typewriters, two steps ahead of those who insisted on the purity of longhand. Now I'm very aware of being one step behind, and expecting to fall further; I'm comfortable with what I have now, this degree of tech versus tradition.

Except, yes, the scanner thing. Every time I post a CEM, I worry. Never lost one yet, but as you say, that is not to be banked upon.

Fujitsu, hmm? I can very easily make £300 sound not-so-much; I only need remember my first printer. Daisy-wheel, no sheet feeder, print a book by standing over it all night feeding in paper by hand, one sheet at a time, listening to the 'ammer-'ammer-'ammer and watching the print-ribbon judder to its end - and that cost me the best part of £900.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-01-19 02:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] martyn44.livejournal.com
Definitely a work practice to be adopted.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-01-19 02:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] martyn44.livejournal.com
I believe it is John Scalzi who has no printer. Editing, on screen? I need a printed page and a red pen. I'm a dinosaur and I know it. Roar.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-01-19 04:40 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Yes, it's John Scalzi. But by the time his daughter hits middle school, she'll likely have one...my nieces do a huge amount of homework on computer, turning in the printouts.

El

Profile

desperance: (Default)
desperance

November 2017

S M T W T F S
   1 234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags