Great Proofing Errors through the Ages

[desperance]

Oh look, '70s TV geekery. Worse, English '70s TV geekery. But I've just watched a rerun of the first-ever episode of Up Pompeii, and I do just love this.

The episode is based around the Miss Vestal Virgin competition, AD 72 (okay, look, it's British '70s humour, okay? Never mind that, just watch the numbers). The characters say so, and it's written on the posters advertising the event. Then, at the event, there's this big banner at the back, which reads 'Miss Vestal Virgin, AD 79'. And no, it's not a particularly curly 2, it's definitely a 9. And at some point during filming, someone must have noticed. But rather than correct it, reshoot it, remake the props, they just ignored it - only the next time we visit the event, the end of the banner has been judiciously wrapped a couple of times around its pole, so that the 9 has completely disappeared. Oh, how good is that...?

Comments

[julesjones]

Not old enough as in "too young at the time to be allowed to watch smut", not as in "not born then", if that makes you feel any better.

I think it's basically someone being clever by giving the last great variety show the perfect vehicle to display his enormous... talent to a tv audience. I still can't see any evidence of it being out on DVD, but I, Claudius is already on my shopping list. I do remember watching at least a couple of episodes of that on its first run, but I suspect that my parents didn't actually realise what I was watching.

[desperance.livejournal.com]

I would imagine not - anyone seeking to protect their precious from the adolescent English seaside-postcard level of smut that runs through Up Pompeii would surely have hurled themselves bodily between their darling and the TV screen sooner than let them see what actually goes on in I, Clavdivs. Snortle. I was, what, seventeen, just escaped from boarding school and finally had access to a TV; any part of that - or all parts working together - might be why it sank so deep into my creative/cultural matrix. I only saw it once, that thirty years ago, but watching it last night I was astonished how much I remembered, and how potent it still was. Of course, it might just be really good TV, but I'm fairly sure that my own receptivity was a major contributing factor. I wasn't really planning to watch it this time round, on the grounds that I can't conceivably schedule twelve successive nights of being in - but one sniff last night, and I think I'm hooked again.

[julesjones]

Hrm. I note that the DVD set is only 27 quid at amazon.co.uk this week - and with boxed sets, the VAT refund usually covers the extra postage to ship it to the US. Just how annoyed _am_ I with Amazon over the ebook format fiasco, I ask myself?

When cable finally came down my street about ten years ago (when I was still in the UK), one of the things that induced me to sign up was the fact that UK Gold was about to start a repeat run of I, Claudius. And yes, after twenty years I was astonished at how much I remembered even though I was eleven (I think) when I first saw it, and at how potent it still was.